Bitter Ashes
23rd June 2009, 15:47
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/group.php?sid=c5b1c936b73f1f1f11ec2fe365734ab8&gid=2231730005&ref=search
Yes, you heard right. They're claiming that this is direct democracy
I. Decisions should be taken as closely as possible to the people they affect.
II. Decision-makers should be directly elected.
III. Citizens should be as free as possible from state coercion.
IV. Local authorities should be self-financing.
V. Policing should be brought under local democratic control.
VI. The state should fund, rather than administer, education.
VII. The state should fund, rather than administer, healthcare.
VIII. Taxes should be simple, fair, transparent, efficient, competitive and low.
IX. The supremacy of Parliament should be guaranteed over ministers, judges, officials and foreign treaty obligations.
X. Candidates for public office should be selected from the widest possible base.
Are you scratching your heads yet?
This is clearly a doublethink manuevre to try misrepresent what direct democracy really mean. Either thar, or they're really really stupid and think that it's a nice name for thier set of reforms on represenative democracy. Dont let them tarnish the name of Direct Democracy and make sure that people know what Direct Democracy REALLY is before this lot of clowns hijack the term.
Yes, you heard right. They're claiming that this is direct democracy
I. Decisions should be taken as closely as possible to the people they affect.
II. Decision-makers should be directly elected.
III. Citizens should be as free as possible from state coercion.
IV. Local authorities should be self-financing.
V. Policing should be brought under local democratic control.
VI. The state should fund, rather than administer, education.
VII. The state should fund, rather than administer, healthcare.
VIII. Taxes should be simple, fair, transparent, efficient, competitive and low.
IX. The supremacy of Parliament should be guaranteed over ministers, judges, officials and foreign treaty obligations.
X. Candidates for public office should be selected from the widest possible base.
Are you scratching your heads yet?
This is clearly a doublethink manuevre to try misrepresent what direct democracy really mean. Either thar, or they're really really stupid and think that it's a nice name for thier set of reforms on represenative democracy. Dont let them tarnish the name of Direct Democracy and make sure that people know what Direct Democracy REALLY is before this lot of clowns hijack the term.