If the party commanded you...

[Dimentio]

If the party demanded you to, in the name of the revolution use this

http://www.germes-online.com/direct/dbimage/50247444/Stone_Hammer_With_Fiberglass_Handle__British_Type_ .jpg

On this:

http://www.sponsorapuppy.org.uk/images/home_puppy.jpg

If you refuse, you are a reactionary according to the Party...

Would you obey their orders? XD

[BobKKKindle$]

With pleasure.

[GracchusBabeuf]

I'd rather go to a gulag :lol:

[RedAnarchist]

What exactly do they want you to do with it? Perhaps instead of whacking the poor dog to death, they want you to stroke it gently with the hammer, because it has a hammer fetish?

[NecroCommie]

In hell perhaps...

[Sugar Hill Kevis]

Donkey punch the party

[Sam_b]

Ridiculous.

[Sasha]

this thread made me go :lol:
until i read sam_b's reaction, then i actually :laugh:

[Bright Banana Beard]

All for the name of progressive!

[Rjevan]

What exactly do they want you to do with it? Perhaps instead of whacking the poor dog to death, they want you to stroke it gently with the hammer, because it has a hammer fetish?
Haha, win! :laugh:

On the question: you ask me if I would follow the order of the great and glorious revolutionary party, if it demanded that I use a hammer on this sweet puppy for the sake of the international proletarian revolution and for the glory of comrade Stalin? What a question! :che::hammersickle:

[mikelepore]

Why would anyone be a member of a party that tells them what to do? The only thing a party has the right to tell its members to do is pay dues. If you can afford to pay dues but won't, your name should be crossed off the membership rolls. Everything else should be voluntary.

[Kassad]

Yes. I fucking hate dogs.

[NecroCommie]

I now officially hate you :D

[scarletghoul]

only if the dog was a trotskyist, otherwise no way

[Communist Theory]

On the question: you ask me if I would follow the order of the great and glorious revolutionary party, if it demanded that I use a hammer on this sweet puppy for the sake of the international proletarian revolution and for the glory of comrade Stalin? What a question! :che::hammersickle:
Who said the puppy was sweet!?
That is obviously a direct descendant of Hitler's dog.
It had all the kittens sent to live with old ladies that sit on them and forget to feed them.

[Qayin]

Animal liberation!
Id use the hammer on the guy who ordered me to hit the dog.

[Pogue]

I'd give the dog to the ALF then dance whilst singing 'Stop.'









Hammer time.

[Jazzratt]

I'd have used the hammer on the dog long before the party even mentioned the idea.

[Killfacer]

I would tell the party about the poor material conditions of the puppy and how it was misrepresented by the captalist historians. Then they would like it.

[NecroCommie]

Animal liberation!
Id use the hammer on the guy who ordered me to hit the dog.
I second that!

[Dimentio]

In the SS, I know they trained recruits by giving them a puppy, to take care of for six months. Then, they came back with the dog and were ordered to dispatch it. If they refused, their trainers started to break legs of their animals until it became sadistic to not kill it.

[Sasha]

hammer liberation!
Id would raise the dog to an vicious atack machine and then use the dog on the guy who ordered me to hammer.

[Wanted Man]

Obey. Party, command me! Die Partei hat immer recht, etc.

[Pogue]

Obey. Party, command me! Die Partei hat immer recht, etc.

Looks like we've found one of the 17%, comrades.

[Dr Mindbender]

Do i have to insert the hammer inside the puppy?

[Wanted Man]

Looks like we've found one of the 17%, comrades.
Thinking of Stalin will do the job.

[GracchusBabeuf]

What if the puppy was replaced by a worker in Kronstadt?

[ls]

What if the puppy was replaced by a hammer in Kronstadt?

[LOLseph Stalin]

only if the dog was a trotskyist, otherwise no way


:(

Anyway, I don't like dogs. Too bad it wasn't Hitler's dog though...

[gorillafuck]

I'd put the handle up it's butthole.

[9]

Fuck no. Fuck "the Party". Forget these "revolutionaries" who articulate their theories with such clarity but then are so quick to act in a manner which explicitly negates the principles of their theory in the name of "the Party". It is unfortunate that this happens so often - it's like some sort of moral fetishism in which devotion to a set of ideals is supplanted by devotion to "the Party", thereby allowing blatant hypocrisy and actions that violate the very core of the original ideals to pass as completely legitimate, and even virtuous, so long as its "in the name of the Party". In fact, "patriotism" operates on this very same basis, rendering actions which would otherwise be morally-reprehensible as heroic feats when sanctioned by the State. This irrational tendency needs to be done away with for a revolution to ultimately succeed in achieving its long-term objectives.

[redSHARP]

obviously yes, the dog is clearly a reactionary enemy of the working class!!!:laugh:

[BIG BROTHER]

I would make a splinter party that is against using hammers on dogs.:laugh: