ev
27th May 2009, 00:37
In international politics, today we have developing and developed nations creating or joining mutual security camps to counter US and NATO expansion and hegemony. These mutual-security camps are increasing international security in ways that the UN and diplomacy alone cannot. They are also increasing the security for member states and it seems only a matter of who will join what camp or alliance. I think that a workers revolution within the framework of these security alliances (within the member states) would provide security from external bourgeois interference. However these consolidated bourgeois camps (focused on economic and military consolidation) will produce a far more difficult challenge for an ideological revolution to manifest.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e8/Current_Major_Military_Alliances.png
What does everyone think about the creation of these mutual-security pacts, and the struggle for these organizations to bring other countries within their pacts to strengthen their international political influence? How do you think these camps affect the workers struggle?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e8/Current_Major_Military_Alliances.png
What does everyone think about the creation of these mutual-security pacts, and the struggle for these organizations to bring other countries within their pacts to strengthen their international political influence? How do you think these camps affect the workers struggle?