Log in

View Full Version : [labor_action] BOMBSHELL--UN Secretary General wants Israel *out of the UN*



ckaihatsu
16th May 2009, 22:53
Yosef M <[email protected]> Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Reply-To: [email protected]


[Full story at <http://www.marxmail.org/msg61699.html>] [What follows is exclusively my own opinion: Sometimes atrocities really do have consequences! Israel's actions are apparently so awful that not all the imperialists want to be around her representatives! Just because the US government always dances to the tune of the Zionists does *not* mean that everyone does. What is the slogan? Sanctions, divestment, boycott? Sounds like a plan to me! -- YM]

"I will ask the General Assembly ... to Strip Israel of its Membership"

Transcript of statement by Ban Ki-Moon via Global Research May 15, 2009

United Nations General Assembly,
New York, NY
11 May 2009

... In many ways, the world today does not seem to be very removed from the barbarity of world war. The invasion of Iraq has lasted longer than World War II, and more tons of bombs have been dropped on that poor country than all the bombs dropped in that great war. The International Declaration of Human Rights, so prized and venerated by men and women of honour everywhere, stands as an impotent relic of a forgotten time because conquest, cruelty, and arrogance are still with us and growing stronger....

Few people know that Israel is the only state to be given a conditional admission. Under General Assembly Resolution 273, Israel was admitted on the condition that it grant all Palestinians the right to return to their homes and receive compensation for lost or damaged property, according to General Assembly Resolution 194 paragraph 11. Suffice to say, Israel has never lived up to these terms, and never intended to.

For 60 years Israel has violated its terms of admission, and for 60 years the UN has done nothing about it. It has watched as Israel heaped misery upon misery on Palestine, and violated international law with impunity.

After Operation Cast Lead, no person, no country, no democracy can look at Israel without thinking of the inhuman slaughter and destruction committed by the Axis powers in World War II, though one could have said the same about numerous past massacres. What atrocities might the world have been spared if the UN had refused to admit Israel 60 years ago? ...

On Nov. 29, 1947, [the UN] passed General Assembly Resolution 181, The Partition Plan, to carve a Jewish state out of Arab Palestine. However, it was never ratified by the Security Council, and so does not exist in law, which means the UN played no role in the creation of Israel. Nevertheless, The Partition Plan was utterly illegal and a violation of the UN Charter, because the UN had no right or power to take land from one people and give it to another....

The past cannot be undone, but the future can change. As its newly elected Secretary-General, I promise that the UN will no longer be a passive enabler of genocide. Therefore, I will ask the General Assembly to meet in special session at the earliest possible time to strip Israel of its membership.

Ordinarily, a motion to expel a member nation would have to come at the recommendation of the Security Council, but this is not an ordinary motion. Because Israel is in violation of its terms of admission, it is not a member in good standing, so the UN has every right to declare General Assembly Resolution 273 null and void. Since Israels membership depends on adherence to that resolution, its expulsion is automatic....

teenagebricks
16th May 2009, 23:22
If Israel was kicked out of the UN, wouldn't they then have more freedom to exploit the Palestinian people?

FreeFocus
16th May 2009, 23:27
Ban-Ki Moon never said this. Furthermore, the GR webpage they linked to doesn't even exist.

Something like this would be all over the news, and if you don't think it'd be in the MSM, leftist sources would have certainly made note of this.

pastradamus
17th May 2009, 04:49
Dont buy it, sorry.

piet11111
17th May 2009, 15:55
found nothing to back this up so i do not believe it.

ckaihatsu
18th May 2009, 04:57
http://turnerradionetwork.blogspot.com/2009/05/united-nations-to-oust-israel.html

Saturday, May 16, 2009


UNITED NATIONS TO OUST ISRAEL!


New York, NY -- On May 11, 2009, the new Secretary General of the United Nations, Ban Ki Moon, announced his intention to ask the United Nations General Assembly to strip Israel of UN membership!

In a stunning address to the 63rd Session of the General Assembly, the new Secretary General said "Because Israel is in violation of its terms of admission, it is not a member in good standing, so the UN has every right to declare General Assembly Resolution 273 null and void. Since Israel’s membership depends on adherence to that resolution, its expulsion is automatic."

The Resolution to which the Secretary General refers conveyed UN membership to Israel "on the condition that it grant all Palestinians the right to return to their homes and receive compensation for lost or damaged property." This provision is embedded in UNGA Resolution 194.

According to the Secretary General ". . . . . Israel has never lived up to those terms, and never intended to. . . . ."

The UN News Agency placed the Secretary General's remarks on its official web site on May 11 and shortly thereafter, a news site in Israel called "News from Jerusalem" published the story on its web site.

Within hours however, the remarks of the Secretary General to the General Assembly were pulled off the UN site! In their place was a second address by the Secretary General, this one to the Security Council which was made the next day, May 12.

In addition, the May 11 story about ousting Israel from the UN was pulled off the "News from Jerusalem" site! In its place is a retraction challenging the validity of the source; sort of the same language they use when challenging the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

According to sources inside the United Nations, upon hearing what the new Secretary General said, high ranking officials in the United States House of Representatives and the US Senate flexed their political muscle, demanding a total blackout of the remarks under threat of losing all US funding for the UN!

Thankfully, our source in the UN provided us with the official UN news agency release and we are pleased to published it in .pdf form at the link below.

Click Here
Posted by HalTurnerShow.com at 5/16/2009 11:08:00 AM

jake williams
18th May 2009, 08:20
Hal Turner (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Turner) is a loony. Go away.

Cooler Reds Will Prevail
18th May 2009, 08:48
This story is bogussssss. Those resolutions, 181 and 194, were not passed by the Security Council and aren't enforceable. Israel's entry into the UN would have only been conditional had those two resolutions been approved by the SC, not just the General Assembly.

ckaihatsu
18th May 2009, 18:32
Hal Turner (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Turner) is a loony. Go away.


Agreed. But what if the *information* is accurate?





This story is bogussssss. Those resolutions, 181 and 194, were not passed by the Security Council and aren't enforceable. Israel's entry into the UN would have only been conditional had those two resolutions been approved by the SC, not just the General Assembly.





On Nov. 29, 1947, [the UN] passed General Assembly Resolution 181, The Partition Plan, to carve a Jewish state out of Arab Palestine. However, it was never ratified by the Security Council, and so does not exist in law, which means the UN played no role in the creation of Israel. Nevertheless, The Partition Plan was utterly illegal and a violation of the UN Charter, because the UN had no right or power to take land from one people and give it to another....

Sugar Hill Kevis
18th May 2009, 18:43
Since Ban-Ki Moon never actually said any of this, shouldn't the thread be closed?