Log in

View Full Version : Michigan Vote in November 2010



DesertShark
20th April 2009, 20:21
I recently found out that there will be an important vote in Michigan this year, one that could create an entirely new state constitution. From the Michigan Chamber of Commerce (http://www.michamber.com/mx/hm.asp?id=concon):

On November 2, 2010, as Michigan voters go to the polls to elect a new Governor, Secretary of State and Attorney General, as well as the entire State Legislature, the electorate will also be asked to decide whether to call a new constitutional convention for the State of Michigan. The ballot proposal will be on the statewide ballot not by the action of the current Legislature or as a result of any petition drive; rather the state’s constitution requires that this question be placed before state voters every 16 years.
Since this proposal automatically goes on the ballot, the constitutional convention question (Con-Con) will be Proposal 10-1 on the November 2, 2010 ballot.
(...)
If voters approve the call for a new constitutional convention in 2010, delegates would be elected within six months. The elections would be partisan, requiring a primary election and a general election to be held no later than May 3, 2011. One-hundred-forty-eight delegates would be elected, one each from every State House and Senate district. These 148 delegates would convene in Lansing not later than October 4, 2011. The convention could be expected to last at least until July 2012. Constitutional conventions in Michigan are unlimited in scope – they can propose a completely new constitution or offer specific amendments. Any proposed constitution or amendment approved by a majority of the delegates must be submitted to the voters not less than 90 days following the adjournment of the convention.
If voters approve Proposal 10-1 on the November 2, 2010 statewide ballot, issues may include:


State legislative and congressional district reapportionment – how to do it.
Direct gubernatorial appointment of all department directors eliminating commission or board appointment of directors of DNR, Agriculture, Education, Civil Rights and Civil Service.
An elected or an appointed judiciary.
Election or appointment of the University of Michigan, Michigan State University, and Wayne State University Governing Boards.
Abortion rights.
Term limits/Unicameral Legislature.
Repeal of the State Officers Compensation Commission.
Removal of the prohibition on the death penalty.
Revisit the cap on the sales tax and the prohibition of a graduated income tax.
Headlee tax limits and prohibition on new state mandates without state funding.
Eliminate the elected posts of Secretary of State and Attorney General and provide for direct gubernatorial appointment.
Public school district consolidation.
Elimination of township government.
Restore affirmative action programs by state government and public universities.
Remove ban on same sex marriage.
Permit a physician-assisted suicide.
Provide for drug legalization.
Remove the prohibition on public aid to non public education.
School funding and equity.

Martin Blank
20th April 2009, 22:43
If this actually passes, it will open up an interesting situation in the state. The issue that a lot of the left is going to have to wrestle with is whether or not to participate in those elections.

h0m0revolutionary
20th April 2009, 22:54
If this actually passes, it will open up an interesting situation in the state. The issue that a lot of the left is going to have to wrestle with is whether or not to participate in those elections.

I don't think there will be much debate really..

It has no chance of going through, similar constitutional reforms have failed many times before..

Also the wording is such that is dosn't mean that the list above will go through if the constitution is ammended, it just gives the Michigan legislature greater jurisdiction over these matters.

STJ
20th April 2009, 23:16
Would be interesting if it passed.

Martin Blank
21st April 2009, 01:43
It has no chance of going through, similar constitutional reforms have failed many times before..

Also the wording is such that is dosn't mean that the list above will go through if the constitution is ammended, it just gives the Michigan legislature greater jurisdiction over these matters.

This comes up every 16 years here, and at this point there are a lot of people who have one reason or another to want to amend the state constitution (pro-death penalty, pro-gay marriage, pro-affirmative action, anti-state senate, pro-marijuana legalization, etc.). Between them, they could cobble together enough votes in the state to pass it. My sense is that there is a real chance of the proposal passing at this point.

If it does pass, the question then becomes how to intervene in the election and Convention, if at all.

DesertShark
21st April 2009, 17:26
This comes up every 16 years here, and at this point there are a lot of people who have one reason or another to want to amend the state constitution (pro-death penalty, pro-gay marriage, pro-affirmative action, anti-state senate, pro-marijuana legalization, etc.). Between them, they could cobble together enough votes in the state to pass it. My sense is that there is a real chance of the proposal passing at this point.

If it does pass, the question then becomes how to intervene in the election and Convention, if at all.
I agree, which is why I think it's important to start mobilizing on the issue now. Start getting people aware of the proposal, finding out what people want changed, and then organizing to make it happen. If there are enough people on the board who are in the state or theoretically could be registered to vote in the state by 2010, we might be able to do something really cool here.

Martin Blank
21st April 2009, 23:25
I agree, which is why I think it's important to start mobilizing on the issue now. Start getting people aware of the proposal, finding out what people want changed, and then organizing to make it happen. If there are enough people on the board who are in the state or theoretically could be registered to vote in the state by 2010, we might be able to do something really cool here.

A vote like this offers an opportunity for education and agitation, in my opinion. If the proposal passes, it will be on the basis of a division among the exploiting classes; there will not be consensus within the bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie over the need for a convention. This offers the proletariat an opportunity to intervene into the breach with its own program and, in this case, draft Constitution.

Presenting a draft Constitution for a workers' republic, based on workers' control of production and elected workers' councils, would allow the proletarian political movement to educate and agitate around the need to sweep capitalism away and build a new society in a concrete context.

If there are others from Michigan interested in a project like this, contact me.