Log in

View Full Version : Nepali Maoists ban strikes and protests



Revy
15th April 2009, 22:37
http://libcom.org/news/nepal-maoists-restate-intention-ban-strikes-other-news-10042009

There also seems to be some factional splitting going on:


Inter-Maoist bloodletting
Matrika Yadav, a former leading Maoist, has split from the ruling Unified CPN (Maoist) party - claiming that leader Prachanda/Kamal and co have abandoned socialist principles and are living in luxurious corruption. (Maoist ministers have chauffeur driven cars and salaries 40 times the average Nepali wage.) He has organised a new party - CPN-Maoist - with other disaffected Maoists.
On Wednesday night (8th Apr) these two factions clashed in Biratnagar bazaar, south-east Nepal. Matrika's faction torched a bus in which the Unified Maoist cadres were travellng. Shots were fired, with some casualties including police. Since then the police are patrolling in large numbers and have had to use baton charges and tear gas to break up clashes. Things are now reported to have quietened down.
Across Nepal such clashes are occurring regularly between different political rivals - disputing various political, ethnic, separatist and other territorial claims. One legacy of the Maoist civil war is that the gun is becoming the first resort in settling rival claims - bullets have become the dominant mode of political discourse.

Dimentio
15th April 2009, 22:39
http://libcom.org/news/nepal-maoists-restate-intention-ban-strikes-other-news-10042009

There also seems to be some factional splitting going on:

Oh shit... does'nt look good at all.

scarletghoul
16th April 2009, 00:06
The CPN(M) used to be so cool, but now they are a disappointment... Seems like either Nepal will become a corrupt beaurocracy or there will be much violence. It is truly saddening. Anyway I think Nepal still has a socialist future

Random Precision
16th April 2009, 00:17
I've been thinking for a while that the CPN would split. It's hard to use state power to develop capitalism at the same time as you're claiming to represent the working class.

Revy
16th April 2009, 00:39
They might just focus on "development" and go the same way that China went. They would focus on building a robust capitalist economy instead of moving toward socialism.

The split is focused around the luxurious lifestyles alleged to be enjoyed by Maoist government officials, and the idea that these people in power have abandoned socialist ideology. It's probably true.

Most worrying is the reports about street protests and labor strikes being banned.

AvanteRedGarde
16th April 2009, 04:18
Unified Comprador Party of Nepal

Jack
16th April 2009, 04:49
Honestly, why do you always delete my posts?