Dimentio
12th April 2009, 00:02
Think we have a post-revolutionary anarchist civilisation...
Anarchism's premise lies on decentralisation within a federalist context. An anarchist civilisation is basically supposed to be a federation/confederacy of autonomous direct democratic communes.
One thing which could be interpreted as a problem is that some of these communes could theoretically strive to be mono-ethnic, or to just accept some belief systems and so on. While they still interact with the rest of the confederacy, they uphold hierarchical and traditionalist values internally.
How to deal with:
A) A muslim community wants to have religious schools and segregation between the genders?
B) A community composed of Serbs want to uphold Serbian nationalist values?
C) A community wants to ban recreational drugs?
How should the anarchist confederacy deal with them?
Anarchism's premise lies on decentralisation within a federalist context. An anarchist civilisation is basically supposed to be a federation/confederacy of autonomous direct democratic communes.
One thing which could be interpreted as a problem is that some of these communes could theoretically strive to be mono-ethnic, or to just accept some belief systems and so on. While they still interact with the rest of the confederacy, they uphold hierarchical and traditionalist values internally.
How to deal with:
A) A muslim community wants to have religious schools and segregation between the genders?
B) A community composed of Serbs want to uphold Serbian nationalist values?
C) A community wants to ban recreational drugs?
How should the anarchist confederacy deal with them?