Mike Morin
9th April 2009, 20:07
"We" don't call for the total abolition of the government(s). We do see very much in the way of parasitic bureaucratic redundancy, Institutionalized Capitalist Oppression, Institutionalized Capitalist Corruption which is only reaching its zenith (our nadir) with the so-called TARP program.
We need to keep the safety-net programs like un-employment insurance, FDIC, FSLIC, NCUA, SSI, SSDI, AFDC?, food stamps. We may also want to institute a small guaranteed income based on age (in some ways that is what SSI is heading towards, although the payments are paltry for middle-aged adults).
We also want to keep the Treasury to provide the currency for financing a peoples' equity union financial restructuring plan. We would want to keep the capability of printing cash, even though it would be more judicious (no speculation and trading in currencies) and more fair (as to be determined by a world committee (don't hassle me about administration and assurance of fair play, but so what, we have those issues with varying currencies anyway)) to evolve to a world currency.
O'bomber's rejection of such an idea ( a world currency) trumpeted by me and crescendo'ed by China and Russia shows the USA's determination for holding on to an economic hegemony and the continuing unjust gains of the privileged parasites of the equity trading class.
We need to keep the safety-net programs like un-employment insurance, FDIC, FSLIC, NCUA, SSI, SSDI, AFDC?, food stamps. We may also want to institute a small guaranteed income based on age (in some ways that is what SSI is heading towards, although the payments are paltry for middle-aged adults).
We also want to keep the Treasury to provide the currency for financing a peoples' equity union financial restructuring plan. We would want to keep the capability of printing cash, even though it would be more judicious (no speculation and trading in currencies) and more fair (as to be determined by a world committee (don't hassle me about administration and assurance of fair play, but so what, we have those issues with varying currencies anyway)) to evolve to a world currency.
O'bomber's rejection of such an idea ( a world currency) trumpeted by me and crescendo'ed by China and Russia shows the USA's determination for holding on to an economic hegemony and the continuing unjust gains of the privileged parasites of the equity trading class.