heiss93
8th April 2009, 17:23
What are your opinions on Tito and Worker's Self-management? It seems like an alternate road to socialism, as opposed to the rigidly planned economy of the USSR. The means of production can be altered by dictatorship of the proletariat. Yet at the same time worker firms, can compete on the market.
Neither USSR central planning or Titoist self-management can be considered full socialism, but both offer possible transitions from capitalism to low socialism.
Neither USSR central planning or Titoist self-management can be considered full socialism, but both offer possible transitions from capitalism to low socialism.