View Full Version : Anarchism and "no borders"?
A_Ciarra
31st March 2009, 20:03
I've been an anarchist for a while now, but I've never understood well what is meant by NO boarders. Obviously there would be boarders with confederations, workers councils and different community set ups ----so just what is meant by "NO boarders" (in a post revolutionary world)?
Wouldn't porous boarders be a more accurate term? What am I missing here?
Invincible Summer
31st March 2009, 20:26
First, for godsakes, it's "borders." :P
I think what it means is that there would be no divisive boundaries... for example the US-Mexico border that prohibits people from going where they wish, and controls the flow of people. Borders are essentially walls that delineate property
Stranger Than Paradise
31st March 2009, 21:11
Yes, No Borders means an end to restrictions on movement. There may be borders between confederations and workers councils but of course these borders would not be like the one's we have today which restrict people to enter a place, Anarchism wouldn't be Anarchism with todays borders put in place.
Jack
31st March 2009, 22:16
destructicon got it right. But it is likely that the current borders would still be used to delagate a specific region. People aren't going to say 40 E 25 N, they are going to say the name of the city that lies in that region, and whatever preexisting borders there were. Just de jure, not de facto.
Stranger Than Paradise
31st March 2009, 22:19
destructicon got it right. But it is likely that the current borders would still be used to delagate a specific region. People aren't going to say 40 E 25 N, they are going to say the name of the city that lies in that region, and whatever preexisting borders there were. Just de jure, not de facto.
The same borders shouldn't be used, some regions should be made smaller and some bigger.
Jack
31st March 2009, 22:23
Meh, it's more of a cultural thing, people in the US when refering to the UK don't think of Wales, England (actually we call all of it England), Scotland, Cornwall, or Northern Ireland.
spritely
31st March 2009, 22:56
borders change. look at old european maps.
Glorious Union
31st March 2009, 23:00
No borders = no walls or restrictions on movement between one place and another.
Lines drawn on a map shouldn't stop anybody from doing what they want to do.
Jack
1st April 2009, 00:50
No borders = no walls or restrictions on movement between one place and another.
Lines drawn on a map shouldn't stop anybody from doing what they want to do.
/thread
A_Ciarra
1st April 2009, 02:42
Very good, so just no restrictions on movement. Thanks all ----but Destructicon, you can suck my big toe for being an ass about my bad spelling. :redstar2000:
Invincible Summer
1st April 2009, 04:14
Very good, so just no restrictions on movement. Thanks all ----but Destructicon, you can suck my big toe for being an ass about my bad spelling. :redstar2000:
I may be an Anarchist, but no one should be liberated from the authority of grammar!
Glorious Union
1st April 2009, 04:39
I may be an Anarchist, but no one should be liberated from the authority of grammar!
http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq278/Repivkrad/118929484857.jpg
You sure you want to go that way? :crying:
A_Ciarra
2nd April 2009, 06:29
Destructicon, I wish you could liberate me from my dyslexia which screws up my ability to memorize the spelling of words.
:closedeyes:
I don't mean to complain - I really don't, but honestly I DO get tired of "paying the tax" of this disability when others judge it as my ignorance, laziness, bad education or what ever - which is often. :unsure: And you were not overboard or anything, not at all, I'm just tired of this little disability because it does not reflect on my mind, or cares correctly. Just to let you know though, I actually avoid this entire web board a bit because I don't want to deal with the stereotyping much of the time... Anyway, please just recognize that poor spelling can be a disability, and not laziness or refusing to be educated etc. I just wish people would chill the fuck out more and assume less, be a little more relaxed rather than critical. A pipe dream I know, but that's what I'm always thinking on this board.
OK, I said my bit like I felt inclined to do.., but you're cool, no worries.
Peace
Glorious Union
2nd April 2009, 06:34
Honestly, I don't have a problem with mis-spelling unless it is so bad I can't read a thing at all.
Invincible Summer
2nd April 2009, 07:01
Destructicon, I wish you could liberate me from my dyslexia which screws up my ability to memorize the spelling of words.
:closedeyes:
I don't mean to complain - I really don't, but honestly I DO get tired of "paying the tax" of this disability when others judge it as my ignorance, laziness, bad education or what ever - which is often. :unsure: And you were not overboard or anything, not at all, I'm just tired of this little disability because it does not reflect on my mind, or cares correctly. Just to let you know though, I actually avoid this entire web board a bit because I don't want to deal with the stereotyping much of the time... Anyway, please just recognize that poor spelling can be a disability, and not laziness or refusing to be educated etc. I just wish people would chill the fuck out more and assume less, be a little more relaxed rather than critical. A pipe dream I know, but that's what I'm always thinking on this board.
OK, I said my bit like I felt inclined to do.., but you're cool, no worries.
Peace
I'm really sorry. I didn't mean to offend you - and you're right people (esp grammar fascists like me) should be more aware/sensitive to the fact that others may have a learning disability.
Sincere apologies :(
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.