Log in

View Full Version : The one quadrillion+ derivatives bubble



NOT_a_Capitalist
30th March 2009, 05:18
The real global financial collapse, engineered by the bankers:



The Invisible One Quadrillion Dollar Equation -- Asymmetric Leverage and Systemic Risk
According to various distinguished sources including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland -- the central bankers' bank -- the amount of outstanding derivatives worldwide as of December 2007 crossed USD 1.144 Quadrillion, ie, USD 1,144 Trillion. The main categories of the USD 1.144 Quadrillion derivatives market were the following:
1. Listed credit derivatives stood at USD 548 trillion;
2. The Over-The-Counter (OTC) derivatives stood in notional or face value at USD 596 trillion and included:
a. Interest Rate Derivatives at about USD 393+ trillion;
b. Credit Default Swaps at about USD 58+ trillion;
c. Foreign Exchange Derivatives at about USD 56+ trillion;
d. Commodity Derivatives at about USD 9 trillion;
e. Equity Linked Derivatives at about USD 8.5 trillion; and
f. Unallocated Derivatives at about USD 71+ trillion.

---

Let us think about the invisible USD 1.144 quadrillion equation with black swan variables -- ie, 1,144 trillion dollars in terms of outstanding derivatives, global Gross Domestic Product (GDP), real estate, world stock and bond markets coupled with unknown unknowns or "Black Swans". What would be the relative positioning of USD 1.144 quadrillion for outstanding derivatives, ie, what is their scale:
1. The entire GDP of the US is about USD 14 trillion.
2. The entire US money supply is also about USD 15 trillion.
3. The GDP of the entire world is USD 50 trillion. USD 1,144 trillion is 22 times the GDP of the whole world.
4. The real estate of the entire world is valued at about USD 75 trillion.
5. The world stock and bond markets are valued at about USD 100 trillion.
6. The big banks alone own about USD 140 trillion in derivatives.
7. Bear Stearns had USD 13+ trillion in derivatives and went bankrupt in March. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Lehman Brothers and AIG have all 'collapsed' because of complex securities and derivatives exposures in September.
8. The population of the whole planet is about 6 billion people. So the derivatives market alone represents about USD 190,000 per person on the planet.



---

The Impact of Derivatives
1. Derivatives are securities whose value depends on the underlying value of other basic securities and associated risks. Derivatives have exploded in use over the past two decades. We cannot even properly define many classes of derivatives because they are highly complex instruments and come in many shapes, sizes, colours and flavours and display different characteristics under different market conditions.
2. Derivatives are unregulated, not traded on any public exchange, without universal standards, dealt with by private agreement, not transparent, have no open bid/ask market, are unguaranteed, have no central clearing house, and are just not really tangible.
3. Derivatives include such well known instruments as futures and options which are actively traded on numerous exchanges as well as numerous over-the-counter instruments such as interest rate swaps, forward contracts in foreign exchange and interest rates, and various commodity and equity instruments.
4. Everyone from the large financial institutions, governments, corporations, mutual and pension funds, to hedge funds, and large and small speculators, uses derivatives. However, they have never existed in history with the overarching, exorbitant scale that they now do.
5. Derivatives are unravelling at a fast rate with the start of the "Great Unwind" of the global credit markets which began in July 2007 and particularly after the collapse of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in September this year.
6. When derivatives unravel significantly the entire world economy would be at peril, given the relatively smaller scale of the world economy by comparison.
7. The derivatives market collapse could make the housing and stock market collapses look incidental.
Three Historical Examples
1. The so-called rogue trader Nick Leeson who made a huge derivatives bet on the direction of the Japanese Nikkei index brought on the collapse of Barings Bank in 1995.
2. The collapse of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM), a hedge fund that had a former derivatives and bond dealer from Salomon Brothers and two Nobel Prize winners in Economics as principals, collapsed because of huge leveraged bets in currencies and bonds in 1998.
3. Finally, a lot of the problems of Enron in 2000 were brought on by leveraged derivatives and using derivatives to hide problems on the balance sheet.

Silicon Valley Watcher - The Size of Derivatives Bubble = $190K Per Person on Planet By Tom Foremski - October 16, 2008

Yazman
30th March 2009, 10:52
Can you supply the original source please? I might follow this up a bit before formulating an opinion of it, there's a lot to digest there.

NOT_a_Capitalist
30th March 2009, 11:43
Sorry can't post links (forum rules), just google "1 quadrillion derivatives bubble" and go to the link that has "Silicon Valley Watcher" in it.

Yazman
30th March 2009, 11:58
Hmm, I found it and I think this thread should be moved to Economics - can somebody please move it?

Interesting stuff though. I think its pretty obvious by now that the vast majority of them knew what was coming and did nothing :)

jake williams
30th March 2009, 16:44
That $1.1 quadrillion doesn't mean anything. It's just a total fabrication. Up until a couple months ago, the "financial markets" mostly consisted of yuppie traders deciding they have billions or trillions or quadrillions of dollars basically arbitrarily. It doesn't mean anything. They can say they have a part of the market worth a sextuplekajillion dollars and it means about as much as this. The only significant part of this is bankers and financial traders are dangerous scumbags, but we already knew that.

jake williams
30th March 2009, 17:07
I felt really dirty after all that so I went and had a shower and now I'm back and I'm still pissed off.

Lynx
30th March 2009, 19:55
These are notional values, but unwinding them will have consequences. Declaring them null and void would also have consequences.
It's a silly game of trying to cover your ass-ets every which way so that risk is minimized. Poof.

fabiansocialist
30th March 2009, 21:57
Declaring them null and void would also have consequences.

Just declare all that sh!t null and void. It's only derivatives. No consequences except some rearrangement of balance sheets for fictitious assets.

Psy
30th March 2009, 22:42
Just declare all that sh!t null and void. It's only derivatives. No consequences except some rearrangement of balance sheets for fictitious assets.
But the dominant capitalists only own said fictitious capital, if it ceased to exist they would cease to be capitalists as they are just parasites leaching surplus value off of other capitalists and it is this fictitious capital that states that they have a claim on a share of surplus value from the capitalists that exploit workers.