sunfarstar
20th March 2009, 20:25
About universal values, about two fierce controversy, right from a human perspective to prove the universality of universal values, the leftists from the perspective of class and practical demonstration of its hypocritical and deceptive. If I say, then between each case, no one would have to rebut the other side. This is because on the universal value of the contents alone, can not be denied, Baidu search "universal value" terms of its interpretation, its content is "freedom, democracy and human rights." Writing a small number of people watch some of the article, but also an increase of "the rule of law, equality," and so on. However, its most important content is "freedom, democracy, and human rights." On the terms for anyone enjoy "freedom, democracy and human rights." Since no one freely admit democracy and human rights, no one required a free and democratic human rights. What we are arguing about is the meaning and substance. West said that the freedom of democracy and human rights can be applied to the Orient. Times controversial concept of the two, I do not think that a fundamental analysis, that is, universal values of the footing is. On this under my.
Look right when they talk about universal values overlooked or intentionally evaded the fact that the real freedom of democracy and human rights must have a premise that equality between human beings. The leftists have never mentioned this point. The so-called equality, including equality of economic status, political status and social status of equality, one of the economic status of equality are basic. With the economic status of equality, political and social status have been to rely on. Equality of freedom and democracy are the cornerstone of existence of human rights, equality among people left, then the so-called free democracy and human rights that has become镜中花water month, the so-called free democracy and human rights can only be the equal status of their social relations trick . Dominant party is impossible to give the inferior status of people with equal status, the same can not be freely given to its real democracy and human rights. For example, one private, between workers and bosses are unequal status, the owner occupies the means of production, the enterprise has the final decision, the workers can only be exploited, to accept the fate of being dominated. This time, the boss shouted Freedom of democracy and human rights of workers is laughable, because when the boss shouted, workers did not gain any power of disposal of the enterprise, the status remains unequal. This time for workers, how can there be, what democracy is all about, how can there be any freedom, how can there be, what does human rights. A further example, is now widely praised joint-stock enterprises. We all know that joint-stock enterprises are many who hold the shares, will have the right to speak the most, once a shareholder of the company absolute control, then the controlling shareholder has an absolute right to speak and the right to dominate, then the other shareholders has been placed in a subordinate position, there is no right to dominate the enterprise. Joint-stock enterprises which are in accordance with the size of shares to determine their status in the enterprise. Then it is obvious that the status between shareholders are unequal. Enterprise affairs, are controlling shareholders the final say. This time if the controlling shareholder shouted Freedom of democracy and human rights, in the dominant shareholders do not appear to be a synonym for hypocrisy to deceive. Since the request of other shareholders is bound to have equal say in corporate affairs, that is to say of all the shareholders to vote on the enterprise's affairs have the power to only one vote, while the overwhelming majority of shareholders should not object to, but because of the controlling shareholder support, and finally adopted situation. Another example, the United States electoral system, but also a clear example of unequal status. George W. Bush and Al Gore was competing for the presidency, Gore votes than Bush obviously, but because of his electoral votes than George W. Bush want to make him lose the presidency. That is not the majority of the people said, but also want a small minority of people decide. This time, where the freedom of democracy and human rights? Those who advocate universal values of people, when you see the system of the United States, can you also believe that the United States is most concerned about the universal value吗? The most desirable country you do not realize this so-called universal values, then why should we move into the Chinese come from? If the Chinese want moved, then good, it is recommended you first want to eliminate the system of exploitation of man by man, recognizes and guarantees the equality between people of mutual status, to talk again at that time universal values, I believe that regardless of which faction will accept it. Tsung-US people, you should call for immediate implementation of the United States Darling equality policy, the economy on the implementation of the shareholders regardless of the size of only one ticket has the right, the workers have not been deprived of the right, on the implementation of all the political one ticket, the abolition of elections Vote people, Congress should not the total for those who occupy the rich. On society of all races must be the true meaning of equality, we should not always white priority. You should and your darling of the United States that you want to implement the policy of equality for all, China will be the first to do so, then the freedom of democracy and human rights will fall on the right to speak Chinese hands. At that time the universal values we must begin by the proliferation of overseas Chinese, this would be a huge threat to the United States. We love America, so we want the United States is responsible.
Look right when they talk about universal values overlooked or intentionally evaded the fact that the real freedom of democracy and human rights must have a premise that equality between human beings. The leftists have never mentioned this point. The so-called equality, including equality of economic status, political status and social status of equality, one of the economic status of equality are basic. With the economic status of equality, political and social status have been to rely on. Equality of freedom and democracy are the cornerstone of existence of human rights, equality among people left, then the so-called free democracy and human rights that has become镜中花water month, the so-called free democracy and human rights can only be the equal status of their social relations trick . Dominant party is impossible to give the inferior status of people with equal status, the same can not be freely given to its real democracy and human rights. For example, one private, between workers and bosses are unequal status, the owner occupies the means of production, the enterprise has the final decision, the workers can only be exploited, to accept the fate of being dominated. This time, the boss shouted Freedom of democracy and human rights of workers is laughable, because when the boss shouted, workers did not gain any power of disposal of the enterprise, the status remains unequal. This time for workers, how can there be, what democracy is all about, how can there be any freedom, how can there be, what does human rights. A further example, is now widely praised joint-stock enterprises. We all know that joint-stock enterprises are many who hold the shares, will have the right to speak the most, once a shareholder of the company absolute control, then the controlling shareholder has an absolute right to speak and the right to dominate, then the other shareholders has been placed in a subordinate position, there is no right to dominate the enterprise. Joint-stock enterprises which are in accordance with the size of shares to determine their status in the enterprise. Then it is obvious that the status between shareholders are unequal. Enterprise affairs, are controlling shareholders the final say. This time if the controlling shareholder shouted Freedom of democracy and human rights, in the dominant shareholders do not appear to be a synonym for hypocrisy to deceive. Since the request of other shareholders is bound to have equal say in corporate affairs, that is to say of all the shareholders to vote on the enterprise's affairs have the power to only one vote, while the overwhelming majority of shareholders should not object to, but because of the controlling shareholder support, and finally adopted situation. Another example, the United States electoral system, but also a clear example of unequal status. George W. Bush and Al Gore was competing for the presidency, Gore votes than Bush obviously, but because of his electoral votes than George W. Bush want to make him lose the presidency. That is not the majority of the people said, but also want a small minority of people decide. This time, where the freedom of democracy and human rights? Those who advocate universal values of people, when you see the system of the United States, can you also believe that the United States is most concerned about the universal value吗? The most desirable country you do not realize this so-called universal values, then why should we move into the Chinese come from? If the Chinese want moved, then good, it is recommended you first want to eliminate the system of exploitation of man by man, recognizes and guarantees the equality between people of mutual status, to talk again at that time universal values, I believe that regardless of which faction will accept it. Tsung-US people, you should call for immediate implementation of the United States Darling equality policy, the economy on the implementation of the shareholders regardless of the size of only one ticket has the right, the workers have not been deprived of the right, on the implementation of all the political one ticket, the abolition of elections Vote people, Congress should not the total for those who occupy the rich. On society of all races must be the true meaning of equality, we should not always white priority. You should and your darling of the United States that you want to implement the policy of equality for all, China will be the first to do so, then the freedom of democracy and human rights will fall on the right to speak Chinese hands. At that time the universal values we must begin by the proliferation of overseas Chinese, this would be a huge threat to the United States. We love America, so we want the United States is responsible.