Log in

View Full Version : CA Bill to Tax and Regulate Cannabis Like Alcohol



Rawthentic
25th February 2009, 00:59
Speaking at a landmark press conference today, California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) introduced comprehensive legislation to tax and regulate the commercial production and sale of cannabis in a manner similar to alcohol.


With the state in the midst of an historic economic crisis, the move towards regulating and taxing marijuana is simply common sense. This legislation would generate much needed revenue for the state, restrict access to only those over 21, end the environmental damage to our public lands from illicit crops, and improve public safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to more serious crimes, Assemblyman Ammiano said. California has the opportunity to be the first state in the nation to enact a smart, responsible public policy for the control and regulation of marijuana.The proposal is the first marijuana legalization bill ever introduced in California.

Its time for California taxpayers to stop wasting money trying to enforce marijuana prohibition, and to realize the tax benefits from a legal, regulated market instead, said Dale Gieringer, director of California NORML, a sponsor of the bill.

As introduced, Ammianos measure would allow for the licensed production and sale of cannabis to consumers age 21 and over. Licensed cultivators would pay an excise tax of $50 per ounce of cannabis. In addition, the proposal would impose a sales tax on commercial sales. (Ammianos proposal would not affect the states medical marijuana law, allowing patients and caregivers to grow their own medicine.)

If enacted, the measure would raise over $1 billion per year in state revenue, according to an economic analysis by California NORML, available online here.

Ammianos bill comes at a time of growing public support for legalizing marijuana. A recent Zogby poll reported that nearly six in ten west coast voters support taxing and regulating marijuana like alcohol.

Faced with a $40 billion budget deficit, other public officials have joined in endorsing Ammianos bill, including San Francisco Sheriff Mike Hennessy and Betty Yee, a member of the State Board of Equalization, which oversees collection of sales taxes.

Currently, tens of millions of dollars are paid annually in state and local taxes by licensed distributors of medical marijuana. However, these sales only represent a fraction of the overall statewide marijuana market. The millions of dollars raised each year on the sales of medicinal cannabis is only the tip of the iceberg, Gieringer said. Kudos to Assemblyman Ammiano for proposing a path-breaking bill that would benefit our economy, safety and freedom by making marijuana a winning proposition for California.

Os Cangaceiros
25th February 2009, 01:13
And it won't make a damn bit of difference as far as the U.S. Federal government is concerned, as shown by numerous infractions by DEA agents against the medical marijuana program in California.

Rawthentic
25th February 2009, 01:38
Are you kidding me? It does make a lot of difference.

Yeah, medical MJ patients do face punishment from the feds, but conditions for them have been a lot better than before.

In terms of this current bill, if it is passed (and there is a good chance due to the current crisis) local and state officials will not arrest those 21 and over who decide to grow, sell, buy, or use it. That would be legal.

I think it can be a step forward, considering the many other bills in process in other states.

Os Cangaceiros
25th February 2009, 01:43
Are you kidding me? It does make a lot of difference.

Yeah, medical MJ patients do face punishment from the feds, but conditions for them have been a lot better than before.

In terms of this current bill, if it is passed (and there is a good chance due to the current crisis) local and state officials will not arrest those 21 and over who decide to grow, sell, buy, or use it. That would be legal.

I think it can be a step forward, considering the many other bills in process in other states.

It does make a difference (obviously), but the key part of my statement was that it doesn't make a difference as far as the Federal government is concerned.

The Feds still consider marijuana illegal and respond accordingly, regardless of what the states say/do.

Raúl Duke
25th February 2009, 01:51
It could play a difference in terms of that if it passes in this state it might create a "domino" and similar bills getting passed in other states. But that's just what I heard when it comes to state laws.

Maybe they'll pass it in Florida one day soon...supposedly the state has a deficit.

which doctor
25th February 2009, 02:07
I'd be really surprised if it passed. It would be nice not having to live in constant fear of the cops though.

SocialRealist
25th February 2009, 02:14
This is a big step everyone. We are going from the time of prohibition to the era of when one will not be charged just for smoking a rather harmless herb. I do really hope this will pass, if it does not I will wonder in my own mind why it did not pass.

I think it should be known amongst the world by now that drugs are not a problem in the legal area they are a problem in the social and health area. When you turn this into a legal issue you create a rather innocent class of curious people into a new criminal class.

commyrebel
1st April 2009, 02:12
I'd be really surprised if it passed. It would be nice not having to live in constant fear of the cops though. In california most the cops don't give a shit i can have an ounces and the cops won't say shit the most they've don has been to take it and stomp it out.

Psy
1st April 2009, 02:51
And it won't make a damn bit of difference as far as the U.S. Federal government is concerned, as shown by numerous infractions by DEA agents against the medical marijuana program in California.

Parts of the federal state are anti-drug, Iran-Contra proved the CIA and FBI are pro-drug, more accurately the CIA uses drug money to fund their black ops while the FBI is all for providing protection to criminal organizations in exchange for regular bribes. This why drug prohibition is a joke since the US federal state is involved in dealing illegal drugs.

Josef Balin
1st April 2009, 03:14
It does make a difference (obviously), but the key part of my statement was that it doesn't make a difference as far as the Federal government is concerned.

The Feds still consider marijuana illegal and respond accordingly, regardless of what the states say/do.
People don't go to jail if this passes. No medical marijuana shops get prosecuted in Cali even if they get raided, same thing for this. So it does make a big difference, and please read more than three minutes on something before you get the balls to bold something to another member.

Mike Morin
1st April 2009, 04:40
Just say:

none of the above!


RU Ben Davis.

Yes, We, See...


Mike Morin
www.peoplesequityunion.blogspot.com (http://www.peoplesequityunion.blogspot.com)