AvanteRedGarde
18th February 2009, 09:33
Interesting. I've heard similar criticisms coming from separate sources. Does anyone know more about this?
Prachandas party accused of revisionism in Nepal
(monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress)
Matrika Yadav, previously a member of the of the Central Committee of the First Worldist so-called Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), has been expelled allegedly for anarchist and undisciplined activities, according to Dina Nath Sharma after the partys central secretariat meeting. I have now quit the Maoist party for good, Matrika Yadav said on February 11, 2009. Echoing earlier criticisms, he claims that he will start a new Maoist initiative, I will reorganise the party in a new spirit, accommodating all revolutionary cadres. When asked whether the Peoples Liberation Army will support his cause, he said that the true revolutionaries would.
Matrika Yadav said that the so-called UCPN(M), led by Prachanda, has become a revisionist and reformist force. He claimed that the Prachanda-led party is capitulating to the class enemy, dissolving the Peoples Liberation Army, and has abandoned its revolutionary character and has been entrapped in the whirlpool of the parliamentary parties and practices. He also said, the party also bowed down to the pressure of the parliamentary forces and agreed to return the land captured by the peasants and landless people during the conflict. He accused Prachanda of mishandling the problems in the Tarai-Madhes, Prachandas wrong policy led to the mushrooming of regional Madhesi parties who represent the landlords. In addition, he complained that Prachandas party was ruled by elitism and nepotism from head to toe. He accused the so-called UCPN(M) leadership of allowing non-Maoists, opportunists and careerists into the fold in the name of unity. (1) (2) (3)
Matrika Yadav had come under criticism as Nepals Minister for Land Reform and Management from Prachandas party earlier, in September 2008, for initiating a movement to recapture land and distribute it to the people. (4) Responding to the criticism back in 2008, he said,Prime Minister had the compulsion to ensure survival of the government. I had the compulsion to advocate in favour of landless people. He also added that he will continue to fight for landless people. (5)
Mao said, without a peoples army, the people have nothing. It is ironic that so-near the anniversary of the initiation of the peoples war in Nepal, Prachanda has ceded leadership of the Peoples Liberation Army and agreed to its de facto dissolution as a peoples army. Prachanda has urged the Peoples Liberation Army to act responsibly for peace throughout this process, according to mainstream reports. (6) Prachandas organization has ceased being an instrument for revolution in Nepal. As Lenin warned, Prachanda did not capture the reactionary state, the reactionary state captured Prachanda.
MSH does not know enough to judge the politics of Matrika Yadav as a whole. Some of Matrika Yadavs criticisms of Prachandas party echo our own. MSH has long warned of the blatant revisionism within Prachandas party. What is needed in Nepal is a Maoist-Third Worldist party that stands absolutely for the global peoples war by the global countryside against the global cities, the Third World against the First World. A party is not scientific if it cannot distinguish friends from enemies. If a party is unable to understand that the entire First World is the enemy of the Third World, then it will inevitably end up as an instrument of reaction; like Prachandas party, it will not be able to successfully lead the masses to communism. Only a party led by revolutionary science, by Maoism-Third Worldism, can successfully navigate the obstacles of the current period.
Prachandas party accused of revisionism in Nepal
(monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress)
Matrika Yadav, previously a member of the of the Central Committee of the First Worldist so-called Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), has been expelled allegedly for anarchist and undisciplined activities, according to Dina Nath Sharma after the partys central secretariat meeting. I have now quit the Maoist party for good, Matrika Yadav said on February 11, 2009. Echoing earlier criticisms, he claims that he will start a new Maoist initiative, I will reorganise the party in a new spirit, accommodating all revolutionary cadres. When asked whether the Peoples Liberation Army will support his cause, he said that the true revolutionaries would.
Matrika Yadav said that the so-called UCPN(M), led by Prachanda, has become a revisionist and reformist force. He claimed that the Prachanda-led party is capitulating to the class enemy, dissolving the Peoples Liberation Army, and has abandoned its revolutionary character and has been entrapped in the whirlpool of the parliamentary parties and practices. He also said, the party also bowed down to the pressure of the parliamentary forces and agreed to return the land captured by the peasants and landless people during the conflict. He accused Prachanda of mishandling the problems in the Tarai-Madhes, Prachandas wrong policy led to the mushrooming of regional Madhesi parties who represent the landlords. In addition, he complained that Prachandas party was ruled by elitism and nepotism from head to toe. He accused the so-called UCPN(M) leadership of allowing non-Maoists, opportunists and careerists into the fold in the name of unity. (1) (2) (3)
Matrika Yadav had come under criticism as Nepals Minister for Land Reform and Management from Prachandas party earlier, in September 2008, for initiating a movement to recapture land and distribute it to the people. (4) Responding to the criticism back in 2008, he said,Prime Minister had the compulsion to ensure survival of the government. I had the compulsion to advocate in favour of landless people. He also added that he will continue to fight for landless people. (5)
Mao said, without a peoples army, the people have nothing. It is ironic that so-near the anniversary of the initiation of the peoples war in Nepal, Prachanda has ceded leadership of the Peoples Liberation Army and agreed to its de facto dissolution as a peoples army. Prachanda has urged the Peoples Liberation Army to act responsibly for peace throughout this process, according to mainstream reports. (6) Prachandas organization has ceased being an instrument for revolution in Nepal. As Lenin warned, Prachanda did not capture the reactionary state, the reactionary state captured Prachanda.
MSH does not know enough to judge the politics of Matrika Yadav as a whole. Some of Matrika Yadavs criticisms of Prachandas party echo our own. MSH has long warned of the blatant revisionism within Prachandas party. What is needed in Nepal is a Maoist-Third Worldist party that stands absolutely for the global peoples war by the global countryside against the global cities, the Third World against the First World. A party is not scientific if it cannot distinguish friends from enemies. If a party is unable to understand that the entire First World is the enemy of the Third World, then it will inevitably end up as an instrument of reaction; like Prachandas party, it will not be able to successfully lead the masses to communism. Only a party led by revolutionary science, by Maoism-Third Worldism, can successfully navigate the obstacles of the current period.