Log in

View Full Version : The European Revolution begins



peaccenicked
6th February 2009, 00:08
http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/02/05/the-european-revolution-begins/
Cailean Bochanan



Glasgow, Scotland



5th February, 2009



“Our revels now are ended. These our actors,

As I foretold you, were all spirits, and

Are melted into air, into thin air:

And like the baseless fabric of this vision,

The cloud-capp’d tow’rs, the gorgeous palaces,

The solemn temples, the great globe itself,

Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,

And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,

Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff

As dreams are made on; and our little life

Is rounded with a sleep.”



The Tempest- William Shakespeare





A flurry of protest has broken out as the depth of the crisis becomes clear for all to see. And it can only get worse as the temple of neo-liberalism, the whole structure of the empire of fraud, begins to crumble returning to the shifting sands on which it was constructed. This is no transient economic crisis, rather it is the collapse of an illusory world of prosperity, a delusional bubble whose expansion is inversely proportional to real wealth creation. The UK , amongst the European powers, is the one which most typifies this parasitic nirvana, a nation which only a short while ago seriously thought it could count its wealth on the basis of the price of its real estate, the exploits of its city financiers and, incredibly, the strength of Sterling. But it is more widely, a ”Western” phenomena, a malaise of the people’s of Europe who have not yet, for all their culture, been able to cast off that assumption of privilege and primacy, consistent with our status as the world’s great imperialists, and have been lured by the promise of eternal well-being, of living life as a dream, as of by right.




This is a rude awakening, but a timely one, for we we’re sleepwalking to disaster. Suddenly, a mountain of difficulties looms before us, but they are still susceptible of solution. Politics, viewed of late as so utterly passe, such an unpardonable diversion from “getting a life’, such an insult to those who had got one and saw ahead a smooth path to fulfillment and pleasure untroubled by reality, is back with a vengeance. It has returned in its most primal form: movement on the streets. It’s basis in terms of programme or ideology is seemingly nebulous. It includes violent protest in states, like Lithuania, which until recently were still resting on the laurels of victory in the Cold War, as well as spontaneous outbreaks in the traditionally more volatile Mediteranean states like Greece. France, of course, has not disappointed with a traditional mass mobilization of public sector workers and youth. Britain has seen the return of the time-honoured unofficial strike, with, almost inevitably, something of a wiff of anti-European chauvinism thrown in. One thing is clear: these protests are born of fear, desperation and necessity; equally, now they have begun they will not end any time soon. A revolutionary process, rather than a single revolutionary event, has been set in motion. It will not come to a halt until epochal issues have been resolved.



The characterisation of these events as revolutionary may seem over-dramatic to some, but if we look to what has happened in Iceland we can see that it is justified. If not much has appeared on our media about those events there is good reason: the people of Iceland have taken to the streets (http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/01/26/power-to-the-people/) and forced the ruling party from power and the calling of elections. This is not an example the elite wish to see emulated elsewhere. Around five thousand people decided to occupy the square outside the Icelandic parliament on a permanent basis until those demands were met thus settling, once and for all, the debate, widespread in Britain during the campaign against the Iraq War, about whether there was any point in protesting in the streets: three times a year, probably not, but every day until you succeed, definitely. I always found this argument strange, anyway, like newly weds deciding to sleep in separate beds because the bride didn’t become pregnant- sometimes you just have to keep on trying. But a body of brave Icelanders kept on trying and they have provided a lesson to us all, one which is certainly worth emulating far and wide. They have successfully given birth to an astonishing movement which is making history.



But where is this movement taking us? It is leading us to the refoundation of Europe. Its economic, constitutional , legal basis and its role in the world must be transformed or redefined in a constructive and legal revolutionary process. Let us look to Iceland as the paradigm of this process. What is it doing?



Firstly, it is reaffirming its sovereignty, through a democratic process: it is making its institutions truly its own and modifying them where necessary. The Icelanders are representing themselves as a people, not as some agglomeration of economic atoms, as consumers in the globalist’s fantasy world. Those moving songs (http://icelandweatherreport.com/page/2), these voices of the people, entoned in parliament square tell of a deep cultural, dare I say patriotic, element. They are not about to become a Dubai of the north (http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/02/02/icelands-marie-antoinette/)and they will resist as they must resist tutelage to the IMF (http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/02/01/iceland-has-new-government-dedicated-to-cooperation-with-the-imf/), to global finance. They will resist colonisation and slavery.



Secondly, it is re-examining the economic basis of the lives of its people. The link between the things people need and their origins in productive and creative labour has been lost. In rediscovering this link, we begin a return to a real economy rather than a fictional one. It is the real economy that must be saved and built on, not the fictional, paper one.



Thirdly, the people have become aware of the existence of a treacherous and criminal element (http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/01/27/whats-next-for-iceland-ensuring-a-fair-election-in-may/) in the elite who have hijacked the country and brought it to its knees. Quite naturally and quite properly they wish to bring these people to account: they wish to reaffirm the rule of law.



Forthly, they must define where Iceland stands viv-avis the rest of the world: they must locate themselves within a world itself in transformation. Do they wish to continue within NATO (http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/01/29/iceland-police-arrest-six-at-nato-meeting-protest/), or break away from an alliance which is itself a permanent threat, a clear and present danger (http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/01/25/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/), to world peace? Or will they become a fully-fledged European power, and, crucially, one which plays a key role in redefining Europe itself as an independent force for peace and global cooperation.



These, I believe, are the fundamental issues facing Iceland and we see them in Iceland under a peculiarly intense focus. Iceland’s problems are our problems, the problems of the Icelandic revolution are also those of the European revolution. Great days lie ahead, days which will call on all our reserves of courage and endurance, days which will not end until we have layed the foundations of a new epoch of world peace and prosperity.

peaccenicked
6th February 2009, 09:44
More from the Irish times.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2009/0203/1232923383586.html

cyu
7th February 2009, 02:08
More from the Irish times.

Nice:


Words coined during the dark days of the 1930s such as “bankster”, which is a mix of banker and gangster, are suddenly back in vogue

scarletghoul
7th February 2009, 02:24
Pfft, this isnt a revolution!

BIG BROTHER
7th February 2009, 02:54
Nice:

Words coined during the dark days of the 1930s such as “bankster”, which is a mix of banker and gangster, are suddenly back in vogue


:thumbup:ditto

peaccenicked
7th February 2009, 08:45
Pfft, this isnt a revolution!

The beginning of a revolution is not the same as the the whole.
This is probably best summed up by old Vlad the bad himself, Lenin.



The socialist revolution is not one single act, not one single battle on a single front; but a whole epoch of intensified class conflicts, a long series of battles on all fronts, i.e., battles around all the problems of economics and politics, which can culminate only in the expropriation of the bourgeoisie. It would be a fundamental mistake to suppose that the struggle for democracy can divert the proletariat from the socialist revolution, or obscure, or overshadow it, etc. On the contrary, just as socialism cannot be victorious unless it introduces complete democracy, so the proletariat will be unable to prepare for victory over the bourgeoisie unless it wages a many-sided, consistent and revolutionary struggle for democracy.


What I am trying to indicate is that reactionary period of not so long ago has come to an end and we are entering a revolutionary period.
The ruling class is confused about what to do about the crisis. The working class is beginning to mobilize albeit in a zig zag matter.

There is no end in sight for daily attacks on working class living standards
and this has thrown up democratic questions in Iceland.

Intensified class conflicts are all but inevitable.

Revolutionaries for whom revolution as a single act have not studied revolution.

Wakizashi the Bolshevik
7th February 2009, 09:34
The Revolution is inevitable.
Wether it happens in the near future or not, it WILL come.

al8
7th February 2009, 10:09
I think the author is overblowing the development of the issue in regards to Iceland. First, the protests where not continuous, they where on Saturdays. And there where no riots, merely scuffles. And a shift in government is not a social revolution but rather a reformist happening. But there has been a "left-swing" as the pundits call it. Else, things are more mundane here than the article gives off.

alhop10
7th February 2009, 11:06
Yes agreed its mainly just rhetorical bombast. I think the author is guilty of a lot of wishful thinking and fantacism about the significance of this social unrest. There have been times of much higher protest that have ended in defeat for the masses.

peaccenicked
7th February 2009, 13:12
A crazy, exhausting week
by ALDA on JANUARY 24, 2009
MONDAY - things are relatively calm.


TUESDAY - major protests begin. People gather in front of the parliament buildings at 1.30 pm and bang pots and pans and drums and generally make as much noise as possible in order to disrupt parliament and get MPs to listen to the people. Rather than dissipating after an hour or two, protester numbers increase as the day wears on. There are clashes with police and people are incensed, particularly as parliament’s agenda has nothing to do with the economic situation but rather includes such relative trivia as selling liquor in supermarkets and what to do about smoking areas in restaurants. By evening there are around 3,000 people in front of the building. Protesters light a fire on the street in front and throw anything they can find to burn onto it. The riot police is out. Some protesters go out of their way to provoke a reaction from the cops, throwing eggs at them, banging wooden spoons on their helmets, spitting, etc. The building, too, is pelted with food and windows are broken.

WEDNESDAY - protesters have stayed the entire night and numbers increase as the day wears on. The parliamentary session that was to begin at 10.30 is cancelled and the PM calls together the leaders of all the political parties. Later that day he announces he has no intention of calling an early election. The same scene as the previous day, only things are intensifying. The police is getting tired and protesters are getting more aggressive. In the afternoon protesters surround the PMs car at his office and pelt it with eggs. The Social Democrats call a meeting in the evening in which they pass a resolution to pull the plug on the government coalition [their leader is away, having an operation abroad]. By evening there are 2-3 fires burning on Austurvöllur square in front of the parliament building. At around midnight clashes with police grow very harsh - protesters throw rocks and heavy curbstones and two police officers are injured. A group of protesters appalled at the violence against the police form a line between the violent protesters and police, shielding police officers. Police use tear gas to disperse the crowd at around 1.30 pm.

THURSDAY - a blog publishes names, photos and addresses of various police officers and their families and urges people to go to their homes and pelt them with eggs etc.; also to post photographs of their wives and children on the web. There is a rising wave of anger at those who are engaging in violent protests, particularly against the police. Hundreds of Icelanders join the “orange movement” to show they support peaceful protests and reject violence. Protests continue outside the parliament buildings despite cold temps and gale-force winds. People bring roses and tulips to give to the police; someone brings hot chocolate and distributes equally to protesters and police officers [the officers are reportedly overwhelmed by this show of support and kindness]. There is a particularly moving interview on Kastljós with the wife of a police officer; she is angry and wants the government to stop using the police as a shield against the protesters, while refusing to talk to the people. A press release is sent out by a number of protest groups urging people to cease protesting on Friday and Saturday nights, as there are fears that drunken revelers will join in with devastating results.

FRIDAY - A meeting of the Independence Party is called at Valhöll, the IP’s headquarters. Demonstrators gather outside. A press conference is called for 12.30 where Prime Minister Geir H. Haarde declares the IP’s wish to hold elections on May 9. He also announces that he has a malignant tumor of the esophagus and that he will not be seeking re-election as head of the IP at the party’s next conference, which was to have been held at the end of this month, but which has now been postponed until March. 1 (http://icelandweatherreport.com/page/2)

Al8. You seem to be misinformed or are fantisizing about every Saturday.
Surely. The levels of violence
is a moot point. The protesters stormed a police station at one point to release one of their comrades., some anonymous donor paid for bail.


Every struggle sets about trying to reform capitalism, even the Russian revolution,
lead at first to Kerensky, who was the leader of the socialist revoutionary party.

The incumbent green left/ social democrat coalition have problems. They have to satisfy an angry people. More of the same clearly will not do.

The author Comrade Bochanan has called it for what it is the beginning.

SocialRealist
8th February 2009, 01:56
One thing I must comment on this so called revolution... Is that will this revolution like many before it, will it be betrayed? This is a question I ask for all of you on Revleft. This question has pondered on me for quite a while due to the fact I have wondered the psychology of both revolutionary and non-revolutionary politics.

Onto that though, I can only hope that this European Revolution will be a democratic one. If the people are not allowed a sense of personal freedom in the post-revolution period what was the reason they fought the revolution in the first place?

al8
8th February 2009, 02:08
A crazy, exhausting week
by ALDA on JANUARY 24, 2009
MONDAY - things are relatively calm.
1 (http://icelandweatherreport.com/page/2)

Al8. You seem to be misinformed or are fantisizing about every Saturday.
Surely. The levels of violence
is a moot point. The protesters stormed a police station at one point to release one of their comrades., some anonymous donor paid for bail.

Well they tried to clumsily enter the police station. Protesters did not succsseed, they where mased by police and and thus failed to extract the inmate by that method. However some anonymous person supposedly payed for the inmates release. It is speculation wether the protest had any direct influance on that happening or not. This happened early on in the advent of the protests.

The protests were more or less intermittent, that is on every Saturday for many weeks, exept for these last days. And there had also been a few creative protests at the side of the main protests, such as a witch performing a curse-ritual against the (then) current holders of office. However even when protesters gathered every day I would not consider that entirely continous, since people do take brakes and alot of the time those that are longest, first and last at these protests are but very few in number. The Mon-Fri protests, however, where numerous in the evenings. Saying that the protests are continous and nothing but is one of the examples of general overstatements or overblown language found in the article.

I'm not disagreeing with that this is a beginning of something else to come, and that the financial crisis is probably going to lead to some similar accute struggles as in the Great Depression. I am merely calling out that the picture the article paints in regards to Iceland is overblown. And I'm not doing that to be a dick or anything, I am just doing it for sake of accuracy.

BIG BROTHER
8th February 2009, 19:52
One thing I must comment on this so called revolution... Is that will this revolution like many before it, will it be betrayed? This is a question I ask for all of you on Revleft. This question has pondered on me for quite a while due to the fact I have wondered the psychology of both revolutionary and non-revolutionary politics.

Onto that though, I can only hope that this European Revolution will be a democratic one. If the people are not allowed a sense of personal freedom in the post-revolution period what was the reason they fought the revolution in the first place?

The fate of any revolution depends on the material conditions of the country were it originates and how quickly it expands to other countries, especially advanced industrial contries.

Dimentio
8th February 2009, 19:55
I think the author is overblowing the development of the issue in regards to Iceland. First, the protests where not continuous, they where on Saturdays. And there where no riots, merely scuffles. And a shift in government is not a social revolution but rather a reformist happening. But there has been a "left-swing" as the pundits call it. Else, things are more mundane here than the article gives off.

In Icelandic terms, this is revolutionary. What to expect from an island with a mere 500 000 inhabitants? There are municipalities in Sweden with larger population than the state of Iceland. I guess that revleft could probably even coup Iceland.

BIG BROTHER
8th February 2009, 23:35
In Icelandic terms, this is revolutionary. What to expect from an island with a mere 500 000 inhabitants? There are municipalities in Sweden with larger population than the state of Iceland. I guess that revleft could probably even coup Iceland.

lol imagine that

al8
9th February 2009, 02:28
In Icelandic terms, this is revolutionary. What to expect from an island with a mere 500 000 inhabitants? There are municipalities in Sweden with larger population than the state of Iceland. I guess that revleft could probably even coup Iceland.

This is not revolutionary "in icelandic term" (whatever that means), the inhabitants are 320.000 and it's a modern industrial capitalist country like anywhere else, with everything which that implies. Revleft would probably not be able to coup Iceland, because first; only the proletariat could overthrow social relations not a smug foreign minority of disparete revolutionary leftist, and second; there would be language difficulties.

Dimentio
9th February 2009, 12:39
This is not revolutionary "in icelandic term" (whatever that means), the inhabitants are 320.000 and it's a modern industrial capitalist country like anywhere else, with everything which that implies. Revleft would probably not be able to coup Iceland, because first; only the proletariat could overthrow social relations not a smug foreign minority of disparete revolutionary leftist, and second; there would be language difficulties.

It will be revolutionary when Iceland leaves NATO.

DancingLarry
9th February 2009, 15:38
Of course there's no great proletarian revolution sweeping the world, or Europe, or even Iceland. And of course any radical/quasi-revolutionary movement that develops will face numerous, repeated betrayals.

However, the point isn't to be seeking some mythic white whale of a perfect red or red-and-black revolution, the point is that these concepts are even back in the mix whatsoever in the larger society and not just in tiny essentially meaningless corners as the sectarian revolutionary parties, websites like this etc. The task of the revolutionary today is to build on the unexpected opening and opportunity we have been given. I've been an active radical for over 30 years, and all I've seen in my life until the last year was the diminishing into effective disappearance of any hope for a radical/revolutionary turn. The hegemony of capital has been so vast and complete, in both breadth and depth, that it seemed unlikely to ever be vulnerable again. And yet, remarkably enough, its vulnerabilities have been exposed despite that vast hegemony. It's our job to drive the spikes we have into those openings, to get about the business of deepening and widening them, of exposing the weak points to a slowly stirring back to consciousness masses emerging from generations of consumerist opiation.There is no guaranty the public will not lapse back into its bought slumbers, but we have more of an opportunity now than we have in generations to make a case for ourselves. Let's make a good one, one that is up to date, based on the realities of present conditions of classes in late capitalist societies, not 1848 or 1917 or Nepal today, but the realities of US and Eurozone and other advanced capitalist conditions in 2009. Because we have a once in my lifetime chance to make our case for a revolutionary left perspective to a public that may actually be inclined to give a listen. Let's not blow this playing sectarian games because we've been caged on the margins so long that we've forgotten how to communicate in any other ways than sectarian dogmas, bickering and nit-picking.

peaccenicked
9th February 2009, 15:40
The big question may be whether the rest of us, in our own potential Argentinas and Icelands, picking up the check for decades of recklessness by the captains of industry, will be resentful enough and hopeful enough to say that unfettered capitalism has been monstrous, not just when it failed, but when it succeeded. Let’s hope that we’re imaginative enough to concoct real alternatives. Iceland has no choice but to lead the way. 1 (http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/02/09/the-icelandic-volcano-erupts/)